SAMPLING: The population of
interest is Middle School and High School students and teachers. For
the High School studets, we used MINITAB to randomly chose 150
students from all four grade levels. We used the same process to randomly choose
42 teachers from the high school level. For the middle school
teachers, we sent an email to see which teachers were willing to
participate. We then went over to the middle school and handed out
surveys to classes that were willing to participate. We handed
surveys to the teachers who responded to us by email and asked other
teachers if they were willing to participate in the study. We
received responses from a total of 173 middle schoolers, 79 high schoolers, 29 high
school teachers and 21 middle school teachers.
OUR SURVEY:
Middle/High School Student
Do you like when teachers
put stickers on your graded papers?
Please check only one.
____YES
____NO
Middle/High School Teacher
Do you use stickers when you
grade papers on a regular basis?
Please check only
one.
____YES
____NO
HYPOTHESIS
TESTS:
MIDDLE SCHOOL TEACHERS
VS. HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS:
1. p1= Middle
School Teachers
p2= High
School Teachers
2.
Ho= p1=p2
3. Ha= p1≠p2
4. α= .05
5. Test and CI
for Two Proportions: Middle School Teachers, High School Teachers
Event = y
Variable
X N
Sample p
Middle School Teachers
2 21
0.095238
High School Teachers
5 29
0.172414
Difference = p (Middle School Teachers) - p (High School Teachers)
Estimate for difference:
-0.0771757
95% CI for difference:
(-0.263357, 0.109005)
Test for difference = 0 (vs not = 0):
Z = -0.81
P-Value = 0.417
Fisher's exact test: P-Value = 0.684
6. 29(.05)=1.45
21(.05)=1.05
29(.95)=27.55
21(.95)=19.95
7. Z = -0.81
8. p = 0.684
9.
We fail to reject the null hypothesis at the
.05 level of significance because our p-value is greater than alpha.
Therefore we have sufficient evidence to suggest that there is not a
significant difference between the proportion of middle school
teachers and high school teachers who like stickers.
Our
conclusion is not valid but would have been valid if our
assumptions had been met.
MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS VS. HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS:
1. p1= Middle
School Students
p2= High
School Students
2.
Ho= p1=p2
3. Ha= p1≠p2
4. α= .05
5. Test and CI
for Two Proportions: Middle School Students, High School Students
Event = y
Variable
X N
Sample p
Middle School Students
125 173
0.722543
High School Students
62 79
0.784810
Difference = p (Middle School Students) - p (High School Students)
Estimate for difference:
-0.0622668
95% CI for difference:
(-0.174800, 0.0502661)
Test for difference = 0 (vs not = 0):
Z = -1.08
P-Value = 0.278
Fisher's exact test: P-Value = 0.353
6.
79(.05) = 3.95
173(.05) = 8.65
79(.95)= 75.05
173(.95)= 164.35
7. Z = -1.08
8. p= 0.353
9. We fail to reject the null
hypothesis at the .05 level of significance because our p-value is
greater than alpha. Therefore we have sufficient evidence to suggest
that there is not a significant difference between the proportion of middle school
students and high school students who like stickers.
Our
conclusion is not valid but would have been valid if our
assumptions had been met.
HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
VS. HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS:
1. p1= High
School Students
p2= High
School Teachers
2.
Ho= p1=p2
3. Ha= p1≠p2
4. α= .05
5. Test and CI for
Two Proportions: High School Students, High School Teachers
Event = y
Variable
X N
Sample p
High School Students 62
79 0.784810
High School Teachers
5 29
0.172414
Difference = p (High School Students) - p (High School Teachers)
Estimate for difference:
0.612396
95% CI for difference:
(0.447736, 0.777057)
Test for difference = 0 (vs not = 0):
Z = 7.29 P-Value
= 0.000
Fisher's exact test: P-Value = 0.000
6. 29(.05) =
79(.05) =
29(.95) =
79(.95) =
7.
Z = 7.29
8.
p = 0.000
9. We can reject the null hypothesis
at the .05 level of significance because our p-value is less than
alpha. Therefore we have sufficient evidence to suggest that there
is a significant difference between the proportion of middle school
teachers and high school teachers who like stickers.
Our
conclusion is not valid but would have been valid if our
assumptions had been met.
MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS VS. MIDDLE SCHOOL
TEACHERS:
1. p1= Middle
School Students
p2= Middle
School Teachers
2.
Ho= p1=p2
3. Ha= p1≠p2
4. α= .05
5. Test and CI for
Two Proportions: Middle School Students, Middle School Teachers
Event = y
Variable
X N
Sample p
Middle School Students
125 173
0.722543
Middle School Teachers
2 21
0.095238
Difference = p (Middle School Students) - p (Middle School Teachers)
Estimate for difference:
0.627305
95% CI for difference:
(0.485130, 0.769481)
Test for difference = 0 (vs not = 0):
Z = 8.65 P-Value
= 0.000
Fisher's exact test: P-Value = 0.000
6.
21(.05) = 1.05
173(.05) = 8.65
21(.95) = 19.95
173(.95) = 164.35
7.
Z = 8.65
8.
p=0.000
9.
We can reject the null hypothesis at the .05
level of significance because our p-value is less than alpha.
Therefore we have sufficient evidence to suggest that there is a
significant difference between the proportion of middle school
students and high school students who like stickers.
Our
conclusion is not valid but would have been valid if our
assumptions had been met.
|